midweek

Who’s On First? – MidWeek, March 11, 2020

admin MidWeek Column , ,

You might think by now, after a decade of delays, snafus, mis-statements, cost-overruns, false promises, and personnel shuffles, that the Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation (HART) and the City of Honolulu would make sure that vital public pronouncements and updates are released in harmony and in tandem. Not happening…

Six weeks ago came a public pronouncement by a HART official that not only would the first segment of the rail be ready, as planned, by late December, 2020, it would actually be ready to transport fans between Aloha Stadium and Kapolei by mid-October- during UH football season! That very same day came a plea/counter from Honolulu’s mayor, asking those kolohe rail personnel to stop making premature statements about start dates, as it’s the City of Honolulu that has to actually operate this choo choo! 

And then three weeks ago, HART announced plans for upcoming traffic restrictions along Dillingham Boulevard, while the City’s transportation department said, “hold the bus” (or the train), because the City had not yet seen an official traffic control plan. HART responded that it had proffered a Dillingham traffic management plan, and the city transportation department very clearly responded that “…we are waiting for the proper submittals”, according to a Honolulu Star-Advertiser report. This plan should be black and white- like written on paper- but here we have two opposite versions of reality offered by HART and by the City, a comic pair who, far too often, mimic Abbott and Costello as they play out this transit “Who’s On First?” routine. “I Don’t Know… third base!!” (Please, YouTube it- it’s a classic Vaudeville routine)

At the very least, by 2020, following a decade of setbacks, worrisome federal feedback, plan pushbacks, cracked concrete columns, cracked canopies, cracked blue plastic shims, etc., you would expect that a simple phone call, email, or text would occur between the “partners” before public statements are made, as too often those initial missives are quickly contradicted, negated, or questioned by the other party.

Speaking of a party, if this project was a party, we’d all be suffering from a long hangover, as quality hosts or caterers would’ve figured out by now what and how to best serve us; after all we are the paying clients. But that’s not the case as rail bantering and bickering goes on with little relief, agreement, or a firm start date in sight.

Think about it…

School Daze – December 4, 2019 MidWeek

admin MidWeek Column ,

What if we started the school day later for high schoolers in Hawaii? Perhaps we’d see less traffic, fewer accidents, and more convenient pick up times as school day conclusion and (parental) work days would finish at a time closer together. Less time for latch key kids to “hang around.” Less trouble. And yes, we’d need big adjustments, too.

All of the above would be nice gains if the school day started an hour later. Plus, sharper students, more productivity, a better learning environment, and probably higher test scores. Anyone who has driven a child to school from afar can attest to the daily drudgery of getting a teen out of bed, fed (hopefully) and into the car. Drop off lines look line scenes out of “Zombieland,” as cars pull up, kids wake up, and then stumble into classrooms. Tardiness rules, teachers rue, and first period blues are rampant as many kids show up relatively dazed and confused. Talk about not being “woke!”

Oh, and this concept has been instituted in institutions… successfully. In 2016, Seattle schools moved public high school start times from 7:50am to 8:45am. According to NEA Today, kids were more engaged and alert, tardiness and absentee levels decreased, and final grades rose by about 5%. The opportunity for more shuteye helped to alleviate teenage chronic sleep deprivation (fatigue, depression, memory impairment).

As adolescents mature, internal circadian rhythms change. Melatonin (which helps us to sleep) in teens releases later at night than in adults. That’s why they’re wide-eyed at 9 or 10pm as you crash. It’s why Junior sags after getting just six hours of weeknight sleep. And the aforementioned Seattle project showed that the one-hour school day delay was productive, with needy teenagers getting more AM sleep time.

California just signed into place a law for 2022 that mandates that no public high schools (or charter schools) may start classes before 8:30am. More proof? The New York Times recently mentioned a Minnesota 2017 study which showed that after pushing start times later “…students who had more sleep reported better mental health outcomes and less use of substances like alcohol and cigarettes,” plus “…had improved attendance and enrollment rates, and they were less likely to drive while drowsy.” So maybe it’s time for Hawaii, home to horrible traffic and habitually sleepy kids (and parents) to say, “see you later” when it comes to start times at high schools.

Think about it…

This article was first published in the December 4, 2019 Midweek.